My Cheatsheets

Order of Operations (PEMDAS)

Remember:


Key Rules


Example

8 + 2 × (3² – 1)
→ 8 + 2 × (9 – 1)
→ 8 + 2 × 8
→ 8 + 16
→ 24

Common Mistakes


Ambiguity & Memes

Many “order of operations” debates stem from unclear notation.

Example:

8 ÷ 2(2 + 2)
  1. Standard interpretation (left to right): 8 ÷ 2 × (4) → 4 × 4 → 16

  2. Ambiguous interpretation (nonstandard): 8 ÷ [2(4)] → 8 ÷ 8 → 1

Only the first follows the formal PEMDAS rule. Confusion arises whenever notation allows more than one plausible grouping, especially in expressions that mix division, multiplication, or implicit multiplication without clear parentheses. The problem is not the math itself; it is ambiguous writing, which allows multiple valid interpretations.


Rewrite for Clarity (When in Doubt)

Ambiguous / Meme Form Clear Intent Version Comment
8 ÷ 2(2 + 2) (8 ÷ 2) * (2 + 2) or 8 ÷ (2 * (2 + 2)) Pick one; parentheses remove debate.
a + b / c + d a + (b / c) + d Linear form needs grouping.
3√9x 3 * √(9x) or (3√9) * x Root “bar” implicitly groups.
12 ÷ 3 × 2 gripe (Left → Right): (12 ÷ 3) × 2 = 8 MD are same precedence.
x / 2y x / (2y) or (x / 2) * y Implicit multiplication not “higher.”

Guideline: If someone could argue on a forum about it, rewrite it.

Bottom Line


Footnote & Discussion

The order of operations is not a mathematical law. It is a socially accepted convention that emerged from centuries of written algebra. Its structure reflects the symbolic hierarchy developed by early European mathematicians for clarity and consistency, not for any fundamental reason in arithmetic itself.

In that sense, PEMDAS functions much like grammar in language:

Someone outside our cultural framework, whether an alien civilization or a non-human intelligence, could adopt an entirely different system and still perform mathematics correctly.

They would simply be speaking a different mathematical dialect.